ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of functional movement assessment on the recurrence of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after treat-to-target therapy.Methods:The clinical data of 61 patients with AS in Chengdu were collected including clinical symptoms and AS disease activity (ASDAS). After 24 weeks adalimumab treatment, motor function score of AS patients(ASDAS<1.3) was assessed by functional movement screen (FMS), then adalimumab was discontinued and the rest of the concurrent drugs were continued until the disease relapse or up to 1 year. The data of the two groups were compared using t-test analysis and Cox proportionate hazard model. Results:① The recurrence rate of patients with AS after treat-to-target therapy within 1 year follow-up was 57.4%; ② The recurrence group was younger [(27±7) vs (31±6), t=5.96, P=0.02], the ASADAS value was at the high end when adalimumab was withdrawal [(1.29±0.07) vs (0.87±0.16), t=177.31, P<0.01], and the FMS value was lower after treat-to-target [(12.9±2.7) vs (16.2±1.9), t=29.23, P<0.01], The time to reaching the treatment target was longer [(2.9±1.2) month vs (1.7±0.6) month, t=19.89, P<0.01] than the stable group; ③ The cut-off value of the FMS test of AS patients after treat-to-target therapy was 14.25 (sensitivity was 84.6%, specificity was 80%) . The time to treat-to-target was a risk factor for recurrence ( RR=2.285, P<0.05), and the FMS value after treat-to-target was a protective factor ( RR=0.625, P<0.05). Conclusion:After discontinuing the adalimumab, about half of the patients relapse. The time reaching the treatment target and the FMS value after treat-to-target therapy are the risk factors for disease recurrence.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of baseline function movement assessment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on treatment outcomes.Methods:The clinical data of 90 patients with AS who met the medical insurance treatment for major disease in Chengdu were collected including clinical symptoms, functional movement screen (FMS) and ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) after 24 weeks adalimumab treatment. They were divided into the non-treat-to-target group and the non-treat-to target group based on the ASDAS score, t-test or χ2 test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influence of baseline FMS on the outcome of patients reaching the treatment target. Results:① The two groups were different in the FMS [(15.8±2.3) vs (12. 6±2.5), t=6.17, P<0.001], squat [(2.2±0.6) vs (1.7±0.5), t=3.57, P=0.001], hurdle spanning [(2.2±0.7) vs (1.8±0.6), t=2.11, P=0.038], straight lunge [(2.3±0.7) vs (1.7±0.5), t=4.23, P<0.001], shoulder flexibility [(2.5±0.6) vs (2.2±0.8), t=2.21, P=0.037], active straight leg raise [(2.1±0.6) vs (1.8±0.6), t=2.35, P=0.021], spinal stabilization pushups [(2.4±0.7) vs (1.8±0.8), t=3.76, P<0.001], body rotation stability [(2.2±0.7) vs (1.6±0.8), t=3.42, P=0.001] at baseline. ② The two groups were different in ASDAS score [(0.96±0.28) vs (2.19±0.52), t=14.69, P=0.000], FMS [(17.4±1.9) vs (12.7±2.8), t=9.77, P<0.001], deep squat [(2.6±0.5) vs (1.5±0.5), t=9.09, P<0.001], hurdle step [(2.2±0.6) vs (1.8±0.8), t=2.80, P=0.006], straight lunge [(2.6±0.6) vs (1.8±0.9), t=4.85, P<0.001], shoulder flexibility [(2.8±0.4) vs (2.5±0.5), t=2.10, P=0.038], active straight leg raise [(2.2±0.6) vs (1.9±0.8), t=2.46, P=0.016], spinal stability push-ups [(2.8±0.4) vs (1.6±0.7), t=10.36, P<0.001], and body rotation stability [(2.3±0.7) vs (1.6±0.8), t=4.76, P<0.001] at the end of the observation. ③ The cut-off value of the FMS for predicting whether AS patients meet the standard at baseline was 14.25 points (Sensitivity 0.733, specificity 0.800). ④ Logistic regression results showed that in the baseline, FMS series of action tests, squat [ OR (95% CI)=0.155 (0.035, 0.677), P=0.013], straight lunge [ OR (95% CI)=0.375 (0.148, 0.953), P=0.039], spinal stability push-ups [ OR(95% CI)=0.136(0.043, 0.436), P=0.001], and body rotation stability [ OR(95% CI)=0.308 (0.121, 0.780), P=0.013] were the influencing factors of the AS patient's treatment outcome ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The AS patients in the non-treat-to-target group have better FMS tests at baseline and at the end of the study than the non-treat-to-target group. Squats, straight lunges, remember stable push-ups, and body rotation stability are the influencing factors for the treatment outcomes of AS patients at baseline.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of applying functional movement screen (FMS) in the sport injury risk assessment of Chinese rugby athletes.Methods Rrugby athletes of Chinese national and provincial teams were selected and their data were collected using the standard FMS test.Their non-impact injury of the lower limbs and trunk were tracked and recorded.FMS diagnostic value and diagnostic cut-off value were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and odds ratio (OR).Results The area under curve of all,male and female rugby athletes was 0.780 (P=0.000),0.877 (P=0.001) and 0.7130 (P=0.013) respectively,with significant differences from AUC=0.5.FMS score optimal cut-off point of all,male and female rugby athletes corresponding to the maxi mum Youden index was 13.5,15.5 and 13.5 respectively.Among all,male and female rugby athletes,the injury rates of the positive group (with FMS score less than the corresponding optimal cutoff point) were significantly higher than that of the negative group (with FMS total score greater than a corresponding cut-off point)(P＜0.01),and OR value of the positive group was 25.85 (95％CI:3.34～200.23),25 (95％CI:2.36～264.80) and 14.22 (95％CI:1.76～114.92) respectively.Conclusion In China,the average FMS score of rugby athletes had a strong correlation with non-contact sport injury,which might become an assessment index of non-contact sport injury risks.There is a significant difference in FMS score optimal cut-off points between the male and female rugby athletes,with that of the female being 13.5 points and the male being 15.5 points.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of functional training on knee pain,functional movement screen (FMS) score and balance in Chinese elite fencing athletes with patellar tendinopathy.Methods Twenty-four fencing athletes with a diagnosed patellar tendinopathy were randomized into a treatment group (TG) and a control group (CG),each of 12.Both groups were given routine physical therapy,while TG received motor function training in addition for eight weeks.Both groups completed the numerical rating scale (NRS),FMS and balance test before and after the intervention.Results After the intervention,the average PRS and FMS of TG were 2.08± 1.24 and 16.25±0.97 respectively,which significantly outperformed those of TG before the intervention and those of CG after the intervention (P＜0.05).Moreover,TG indicated superior results in parameters of static postural balance including center of pressure,total length of swinging pathway,maximal length of swinging pathway,and area of swinging pathway when compared to TG before the intervention and CG after the intervention(P＜0.05).Conclusion The motor functiontraining is effective in improving functional movement and balance in elite fencing athletes with patellar tendinopathy.